610SPOR2 35h_CBSSportsRad_Houston

News

Texas AG: Same-Sex Marriage Benefits Unconstitutional

View Comments
File photo of flag. (credit: Mario Tama/Getty Images)

File photo of flag. (credit: Mario Tama/Getty Images)

Featured Items

77820352_8Reluctantly Jumping On The Clowney Bandwagon

77820352_8O'Brien: "We Will Draft A Quarterback"

77820352_8Hot Cheerleaders - Funny Faces

77820352_8Some College Cheer

From Our CBS Music Sites

77820352_8What Is The WORST Series Finale?

77820352_8What Is The BEST Baseball Movie?

77820352_8Nun Stuns All On The Voice Italy, Breaks YouTube Record

77820352_8Conan O'Brien Fires Off On Houston

Get Breaking News First

Receive News, Politics, and Entertainment Headlines Each Morning.
Sign Up

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Local governments and school districts that offer marriage benefits to same-sex partners are violating the state constitution, Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott stated in an opinion Monday.

The cities of Austin, El Paso and Forth Worth already offer some benefits to domestic partners, while Pflugerville, outside Austin, became the state’s first school district to extend similar benefits.

Tea party-backed state Sen. Dan Patrick of Houston asked Abbott, a fellow Republican, to review the matter in November. Patrick argued that Texas amended its constitution in 2005 to define marriage as between one man and one woman, while prohibiting government entities from recognizing anything similar to marriage.

In a six-page opinion, Abbott found that the constitution “prohibits political subdivisions from creating a legal status of domestic partnership and recognizing that status by offering public benefits based upon it.” He said city governments and school districts constitute political subdivisions.

In a statement, Patrick said the measure, known as the Marriage Amendment, was passed by “an overwhelming majority of the Texas Legislature and ratified by more than 75 percent of Texas voters.

“This opinion clearly outlines that cities, counties and school districts cannot subvert the will of Texans,” Patrick said.

Amanda Brim, a spokesman for Pflugerville Independent School District, said of Monday’s opinion, “We’re just reviewing it and have no response at this point.”

Texas Values, a conservative advocacy group, claimed that Austin Independent School District was “attempting to be the second school district in Texas to give legal recognition to domestic partnerships.”

“General Abbott’s opinion now makes it clear, Pflugerville ISD and other local governmental entities in Texas are in clear violation of the Texas Constitution,” said the group’s president, Jonathan Saenz. “Pflugerville ISD and Austin ISD are teaching their students a terrible lesson about the importance of following the law if these rogue school districts don’t immediately end their unconstitutional policy.”

Saenz’s group is backing House Bill 1568, a proposal that states that offering benefits to same-sex domestic partners “is essentially contrary” to the Marriage Amendment. It seeks to revoke accreditation status and even state funding to any school district that violates the constitution.

No so fast, said Rebecca L. Robertson, legal and policy director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Texas.

“The attorney general’s opinion that government employers who offer domestic partner benefits are somehow in conflict with the Texas Constitution’s definition of marriage is just that — an opinion — and we strongly disagree with him,” Robertson said in a statement Monday. “Contrary to the AG’s reasoning, giving an employee the ability to purchase insurance coverage for his or her family does not create a legal relationship even remotely similar to marriage.”

(© Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

View Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus